SOC205 - WEEK 4 - DISCUSSION 1

SOCIETY, LAW AND GOVERNMENT

"President’s Effect in Appointing Federal Judges"

Referring to the study regarding the effect of presidential philosophy on the selection of judges in Chapter 7, determine two (2) ways in which presidential philosophy can impact judicial decision making. Draw three (3) conclusions from the study. Provide specific examples to support your rationale.

Two ways in which the presidential philosophy also known as the presidential ideology in the selection of judges can impact judicial decision making is as follows:

Devotion and depth of commitment to fulfill and support corresponding political beliefs and attitudes toward making true accurate decisions to glorify the country and further support, care for the citizens and protect all therein.

Secondly, the next reason for the selection of judges is to also not lead to a prevalency of sameness in attitudes but also allow diversity of backgrounds without bias or restriction. Further, the acknowledgment of balance needed in all judicial judges should be reflective of those who are seen as adverse to civil rights as well as those in favor of civil rights.

Diversity in thought, background, assimilated purpose allows for a parallel equity that reflects the overall populace. Also, those with singular or dual or tri ideological perspective allows for intriguing, enthralling informative arguments for and against the passing and concluding of laws, reflective summation of cases, conduct and interjections for changes whether in argument against said case or in addition to facilitate a case’s plea or denial of plea. Therefore, competency and agile mental acuity is prevalent as well as the course of honor, integrity, delicacy and balance.

Three conclusions I can draw from the study include: Parallel thought, coincidental ideology equates to pushes for changes and effective measures and ability to facilitate because of those who have been positioned to put a plan in action and “make it work” in the most expedient time frame possible.

First Example

President elect

After swearing in, my first agenda is to change the pension plans of America to allow the widow or widower more of the deceased spouse’s income as well as provide a burial plan and last pension irregardless of date deceased. For example, widow dies on August 31 and monthly check is dated September 1 she or he is still entitled to check as well as the remaining amount that have been placed in the budget for the year.

Second Example

To change the allowance of insurance to prevent fraud but allow all to fix teeth without a prevention to state must wait and be contingent on current dental position versus allowance to help keep America smiling.

In clarification, modify and allow all to participate and not be based on income so that the working poor (which is predominately all of America) is not endangered and protected with insurance to fix teeth in any income bracket. Further to acknowledge that compiled measures of establishing income are not true accuracy of net worth or to be considered liquid.

These examples are some of the issue that affect the populace and need due process to assist those in need who look at self and despair of good representation. The right to protect, advance the people and provide an impetus to march on and continue is what all is looking for in judges. Serving America means loving, protecting the populace and be the continuance of our backbone.

Specify the role that you believe politics can play when a court hands down a decision on a divisive issue. Identify two (2) effects that a political party can have on the public interpretation of the court’s ruling. Provide specific examples to support your rationale.

The role that I believe politics can play when a court hands down a decision on a divisive issue includes the allowance of diversity to come into effect. By stating this even though the courts are divided on an issue it does not necessarily mean a separation of thought it just means a differing parlay has caused a stand-off of alteration of thought on subject and a present stand-off.

In reconciliation of the stand-off this would consist of mediation and further exploratory investigation to ensure total clarity and explanation and then a resubmit of issue.

Two effects that a political party can have on the public interpretation of the court’s ruling include either in support of their actions or against their actions.

Favorable regard will cause praise and enthused acceptance whereas unfavorable regard will cause large measures of discontent and petition to halt, stall and fight decision.

First Example

Women’s right to vote revoked.

Causal effect of this action would cause ripples of distress and fear for self, sanctity and protection. Further it would cause suspicious watch that women are being attacked with unfound warrant and ulterior motive cloaked within.

The effect would cause a spiraling of unrest worldwide due to America being a worldwide power and an exemplified example that all follow in the treatment and protection of women and their rights. The subsequent denial would be reversed but never forgotten and would make all that women move for and act upon a measure to fight continuously for.

Second Example

School Segregation

The act of segregation of schools is reflective of race hierarchy and lack of equality. Based and threaded within are high levels of bigotry, prejudice, condescension, discrimination, hate and intentional oppression.

The intentional oppression are levied to facilitate informal and common belief of those who are looked upon as inferior as incapable of assimilating same worth as those viewed as the race at the top of the hierarchy tree. Because of this the act of separate ensures the inability to fight the informal thought as well as stop the “myth” of not having equality that equals lack of intelligence to inability as well.

By establishing of using Maslow’s Pyramid all can be moved to said correct position and are able to receive conductive education to steadfast reflect and stand that all are worthy and able to assimilate and gain.

Thank you.

Felicia

SOCIETY, LAW AND GOVERNMENT
WEEK 4 - DISCUSSION 1
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT

I agree that it is true that some presidents appoint judges that have ideologies or philosophies that are similar but sometimes there can be someone out there who is not of the same party (or cut from the same clothe) but have outstanding philosophy that cannot be bypassed.

Comfort is as comfort does ... it does not excite, change or rattle the bones or bang the chest.

Evolution is what is needed and that means clashing and head-on collisions make a difference happen in politics.

For example, Politics is the horn and I am the player.

Thank you.

Felicia