In Gun Debate even Language can be loaded

Ms. Felicia McCaw
Language in Education
English 370
Response (2)

In Gun Debate even Language can be loaded

The language of guns, violence and the subsequent consequences of association that even
a turn of phrase can indicate a tendency or whim to utilize violence as an ultimate result to
culminate a desired wish. As per this article, the goal of the Brady Campaign is to promote
and push for restriction because of the Connecticut School shootings by public display.

Language of guns seem to be a bulls-eye on everyone’s back whether for it or against the flay of skin still lingers in the wind of channels lite for all to see. Further, this article reflects that the usage of language is a versatile transmitter that is capable of relaying double messages (entendre) and puns that bespeak something different than originally addressed. These avenues support a causal effect and allowed the visual shock that ran through the world to see the damage and acts done by the usage of guns in massacre of innocent children.

Relying on the use of clever entendre, dual meaning and metaphoric shields the language of guns, violence, mayhem is indeed allowed play. When violence and aggression is embedded as a second nature than the thought should not surprise that violence whether with a weapon or a gun decidedly is indeed the challenge to be rid of. Guns and the use of language as an aggressive fort of violence will indeed perpetuate the acts of guns. Because of this sidestepping is taking place due to landslides of emotional avenues of sensitivity that hopefully will circumvent a possible venue of violence to be levied against the person making a comment of factual thought. Checking once and then twice is the goal of smooth negation of relayed peaceful maneuvers.

Ms. Felicia McCaw
Language in Education
English 370
Response (2)
Page 2

Discovering a thought and flying high is the purpose of cutting the loop and that is to intentionally recede a person’s right to disagree and submerge it under for indeed a failed missile that mistook the avenue of chained command.
Further support of one is sometimes relayed as a thought that should be attacked by the subtlety of a cracking egg shot by indeed a cannon. Looking neither left or right is the goal to stop and halt and pretty much say “who is next” and receive the flay of skin removed levels of cognitive thought being used.

The article relays the view that the exploration of language and the usage of meaningful structures of compiled units reflect the ability to immerse hidden thought under layers that do not hide the true content or intent. That language as relayed by Larry Andrews (Language Exploration and Awareness) is a vehicle of thought with emphasis of meanings, conveyance of thoughts and ideas to effectively communicate a point. I agree with the content in the article that the usage of language can be a loaded gun that can incite the most unpredictable results and instigate continuous waves of negative and positive responses.

Furthermore, the thought that sometimes language can be used to incite as well as encourage can be a revealing thought and a point can be established by not clearly stating but encoding by usage of puns, entendre or whatever phraseology to sidestep and leave maneuverability and a fight stance if necessary. The article is addressed adequately to show the

Ms. Felicia McCaw
Language in Education
English 370
Response (2)
Page 3

style of hidden layers of thought without obviously stating and with a protective barrier from future legal ramifications and is thoroughly covered as a brief touch basis and reflects with authority by not just stating but by clear written reflected thought on the area of discussion. Further it allows the clear reflection that the topic is approached with no reflective or personal bias but is objectively written with no favoring of either side.


Article:
The New York Times
January 15, 2013
In Gun Debate, Even Language Can Be Loaded
By Peter Baker