RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
The fundamental reasons are correct … exposing anyone to a disease or unwanted sex and knowingly does so is a criminal and is a criminal offense and should be charged and locked away. Children’s parents are the ones who should not want a sex offender in the neighborhood but the facts is they are heavily perpetuated in the low social economy areas and there is resistance in getting them removed from those neighborhoods. I also agree once a sex offender or criminally deviant sex offender sees an avenue to attack they will repeat the pattern and behavior.
As with any type of internet abuse is what the government handles and information that destroys a person’s life, with footage etcetera that entices additional victimization whether the behavior is sexual or predatorial in nature.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the laws have some problems overlapping due to territory lines but this can be worked out by extradition with charges filed and pressed in the state the crime occurred. The laws are made to correct and deter deviances and flagrant disobeying of laws to curve sexual deviance in relation to any sexual exploitation.
The laws regarding children, disabled, and elderly, and the female sex who are the most preyed upon are explicit irregardless to family or intrafamily and they abide with strictness on abuse whether sexual or other in regard to all laws to protect them. Local, state and federal are not a dictatorship … all are free to choose a partner and all rights should be protected and as long as the acts do not cause a problem with the law then it is not a legal issue but a moral concern between partners.
Heterosexual deviance is concerned with acts that differentiate from normal sexual activities. Also, it is not the community that deems an act to be judged but the legal sanctions that guard the structural guidelines of society and relays normalcy.
Thank you.
Felicia
"Perceptions of Intimacy"
Go to the Office of Justice Programs Website located at https://ojp.gov/smart/sorna.htm or use the Internet to research "Sex Offenders and Sex Offenses." Next, specify two (2) fundamental advantages and two (2) disadvantages of state or federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance.
Two advantages of state and federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance are that they serve as reinforcement of normative sexual norms and correct behavior to prevent acts outside the sexual norm that are seen as deviant and criminal. Therefore, the law is a complement and protector of the populace whether in or out of prison.
Also, the laws make it possible to cross borders between states and international borders if the culprit is an American citizen or an adoptee of American standing. Another advantage it clearly lists what is applicable and addressable when a manner of kidnapping occurs and the victim’s will is submerged and subjugated to enact an unwanted sexual act or display to render a citizen powerless and victimized. Further, the act of transporting minors whether with permission or not is also considered an act of deviance and a willing perversion of the party that coaches and encourages obvious acts of criminality and lasciviousness.
Two disadvantages of state or federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance are a near endless source of troubled people with sexual deviance associated with emotional and mental problems. Another disadvantage is that sexual deviance is deeply interwoven in organized crime and as such the deterring of sexual deviance is an uphill battle to keep a moralistic value and principle as a standing rod against the crumbling of societal structure and battle against crime and compliance with evil against people.
Next, take a position as to whether the government (local, state, or federal) should govern consenting adults using the Internet to engage in adult activities. Provide a rationale to support your response.
The government whether local, state or federal have the ability to govern what is permissible on the internet but runs the risk of violating the First Amendment. Because the act of sexuality is deemed an act of consent by adults and their rights and ability to view or read literature or expression of photographic images that can be seen as unwritten language and communication. Thereby, it is hard to govern what an adult can view unless the governmental system is totalitarian in nature and has free will to restrict the input and assimilation of what is seen as unseemly or detrimental to a populace. Further if the expression is not of a nature to encourage lasciviousness or has a conflict against the law then the expression is choice due to a democratic society.
Thank you.
Felicia
The fundamental reasons are correct … exposing anyone to a disease or unwanted sex and knowingly does so is a criminal and is a criminal offense and should be charged and locked away. Children’s parents are the ones who should not want a sex offender in the neighborhood but the facts is they are heavily perpetuated in the low social economy areas and there is resistance in getting them removed from those neighborhoods. I also agree once a sex offender or criminally deviant sex offender sees an avenue to attack they will repeat the pattern and behavior.
As with any type of internet abuse is what the government handles and information that destroys a person’s life, with footage etcetera that entices additional victimization whether the behavior is sexual or predatorial in nature.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the laws have some problems overlapping due to territory lines but this can be worked out by extradition with charges filed and pressed in the state the crime occurred. The laws are made to correct and deter deviances and flagrant disobeying of laws to curve sexual deviance in relation to any sexual exploitation.
The laws regarding children, disabled, and elderly, and the female sex who are the most preyed upon are explicit irregardless to family or intrafamily and they abide with strictness on abuse whether sexual or other in regard to all laws to protect them. Local, state and federal are not a dictatorship … all are free to choose a partner and all rights should be protected and as long as the acts do not cause a problem with the law then it is not a legal issue but a moral concern between partners.
Heterosexual deviance is concerned with acts that differentiate from normal sexual activities. Also, it is not the community that deems an act to be judged but the legal sanctions that guard the structural guidelines of society and relays normalcy.
Thank you.
Felicia
"Perceptions of Intimacy"
Go to the Office of Justice Programs Website located at https://ojp.gov/smart/sorna.htm or use the Internet to research "Sex Offenders and Sex Offenses." Next, specify two (2) fundamental advantages and two (2) disadvantages of state or federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance.
Two advantages of state and federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance are that they serve as reinforcement of normative sexual norms and correct behavior to prevent acts outside the sexual norm that are seen as deviant and criminal. Therefore, the law is a complement and protector of the populace whether in or out of prison.
Also, the laws make it possible to cross borders between states and international borders if the culprit is an American citizen or an adoptee of American standing. Another advantage it clearly lists what is applicable and addressable when a manner of kidnapping occurs and the victim’s will is submerged and subjugated to enact an unwanted sexual act or display to render a citizen powerless and victimized. Further, the act of transporting minors whether with permission or not is also considered an act of deviance and a willing perversion of the party that coaches and encourages obvious acts of criminality and lasciviousness.
Two disadvantages of state or federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance are a near endless source of troubled people with sexual deviance associated with emotional and mental problems. Another disadvantage is that sexual deviance is deeply interwoven in organized crime and as such the deterring of sexual deviance is an uphill battle to keep a moralistic value and principle as a standing rod against the crumbling of societal structure and battle against crime and compliance with evil against people.
Next, take a position as to whether the government (local, state, or federal) should govern consenting adults using the Internet to engage in adult activities. Provide a rationale to support your response.
The government whether local, state or federal have the ability to govern what is permissible on the internet but runs the risk of violating the First Amendment. Because the act of sexuality is deemed an act of consent by adults and their rights and ability to view or read literature or expression of photographic images that can be seen as unwritten language and communication. Thereby, it is hard to govern what an adult can view unless the governmental system is totalitarian in nature and has free will to restrict the input and assimilation of what is seen as unseemly or detrimental to a populace. Further if the expression is not of a nature to encourage lasciviousness or has a conflict against the law then the expression is choice due to a democratic society.
Thank you.
Felicia
No comments:
Post a Comment