Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues - CRIMINAL JUSTICE 220

Philosophical and Practical
Approach for Balancing Issues
1


Philosophical and Practical Approach
for Balancing Issues
Strayer University
Felicia McCaw
Professor Judy Tompkins
CRJ 220
Online Summer 2016
September 10, 2016


Philosophical and Practical Approach
for Balancing Issues
2

In my eternal quest for the rights of the people and ethical treatment to be fairly represented and distributed the goal is to implement utilitarianism in all forms of correction. This will ensure that there will be no disproportionate harsh or disproportionately lenient penalties.

Summarily, realizing the need to respect human dignity revolves around the end and as such the evolving of thought to conceive that all are rational, logical, responsible human beings. Because of this the respecting of their freedom and rationality by holding them in account for their deeds and designating corrective action to circumvent and prevent further actions as well as prevent emulation.

Moralistic values when merged with law enforcement compels the acknowledgement and moral right of the law to punish offenders and actively enact moral duty. Moral duty is intertwined with the interest of justice and facilitates its purpose to be ethical and principled acts of mercy and justice to ensure that punishment is proportioned with fairness, equated with rational time and retainership of respect.

Individual rights and public protection is immeasurably complicated and has a tremendous amount of intricacies and underlayments of complexity. Therefore, the correct handling of situational racial interaction has come forth as a blatant screaming flag that needs addressing with finesse and delicacy. Desensitization levels have risen as well as personal contempt and tolerance when dealing with people of different races.

As a philosophical and practical avenue for balancing issues would be the acknowledgment and acceptance that there is a problem. Next, would be the admission of all

Philosophical and Practical Approach
for Balancing Issues
3

internal bias and then effectively analyze with a high ethical approach to change (evolve) thought and action to ensure that a qualitative standard can be met to prevent compromise of self and moral duty.

Ethical choices and decisions will always be based on factual rights, wrongs, ideas of complexity, applications and interpretation. Further because values are intrinsic of cultural behavior this allows ethics to stand as a base as well as a support to alter situations and bring about changes and different approaches in ensuring fairness attributed to the public (protection) as well as establishing their clear individual rights.

As a person of high ethics, it is my responsibility and duty to be an effective means to an end. Further to find a way to protect as well as deflect old perceptions and embrace new perceptions. With the embrace of new perceptions brings forth the code of consequence and actions that prevent unacceptable behavior and embrace radical acceptable behavior. Ethics can only be a tool of assessment and thereby be an impeling tool (force) to use in corrective patterns of disturbance in the populace. Social norms and legalistic norms are imperative to continue and contain within structural society as well as be a fecundity to teaching and standards.

My approach to reward and punishment in the Criminal Justice field is to first acknowledge the need for punishment for acts of criminality, fairness to all includes the victim and the culprit because it impels the necessity to properly analyze and gauge the extent that this act of supposed random criminality has done in the populace.

Each act of criminality is always copycatted or emulated with the expectation of the end result of possible success. As such the realization is that the study of criminality is not just a

Philosophical and Practical Approach
for Balancing Issues
4

prevalence of doing an act of criminality or sporadic temptation to act as a criminal. It is a pattern of complete deliberate action to usurp the legalistic system and thereby destroy the structural base of social norms that protect society, people and country. Further since the acts of criminality are not sporadic but contemptuously made and done. It is our duty to evaluate and change our entire approach to dealing with these acts to maintain a semblance of safety for even the poorest of people to the rich.

Although the reward and punishment is an equitable thought the structural base of who can have, who can’t have, who should be poor, who can be educated, who can’t be educated is part of the dilemma of discontent and temptation to act, think, feel and evolve to a criminal. When the moral issues of crime is effectively explained and the searing cruel impact has been met, countered and conquered then comes the acknowledgment that for our own safety the good of the legalistic system is working overtime to help but is spiraling downward due to inappropriate action in some scenarios.

Therefore, with the realization that criminality has evolved it is my intent to study the changing face of crime and its new look. Consequently, since it has evolved therefore the approach of practice and balancing issues of threat to the populace has to be countered, checked and hopefully escalated down. The safety of all is primary and the law is secondary always.

Once Sleeping Beauty slept until she became wide awake and realized her danger and this country and others. Further because of this the state of unconscious became indifferent to the prevalency and increase of crime until it has threatened the inner core of stability (founders) and supporters of this country by deliberate escalation of crime to distort the usual pattern.

Philosophical and Practical Approach
for Balancing Issues
5

Human rights of the impoverish are threatened by criminal neglect in education, safety, concern and care for the underdog.

As a part of those against criminality it is my realization that it is our right to protect the weak, individual liberty and be an instrument to always measure and counter thrust attacks against this nation and ours. The perception of danger is imminent, apparent and we are to foil, protect and discard any immoral acts of lying to gain an end.

Any acts of immorality consistently lower standards and principles to a behavior of the lowest criminal. These criminals become your bedfellow and prevent objectivity, fairness, honesty, equitable fair thought and values. As such the purpose is to withstand from compromising self and becomes duty, honor, pride, care and love. The teaching of such is the highlight of my life. Do not compromise self else we lose all social and legal structure.

Lastly for all law enforcement professionals, the ethics of care acts as a facilitator of justice and its impartiality in applying laws, rules, procedures and principles. Along with care and supported by justice the emotional levels are controlled and channeled through utilitarianism to encourage the acts of application of principles to prevent bias.

Therefore, with the levels of fairness addressed so can the level of peacemaking criminology to assist and support the affective states of ambivalence because emotional levels cannot be controlled. But peacemaking entitles us all to put aside anger and acts as facilitators, correctors of criminal acts and protectors of the populace and this country.

References

Bishop, W.w. (2013). The Role of Ethics in 21st Century Organizations. Journal Of Business Ethics. 118(3), 635-637. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1618-1
Kanter, S. (2011). SLEEPING BEAUTY WIDE AWAKE: STATE CONSTITUTIONS AS IMPORTANT INDEPENDENT SOURCES OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 15(3), 799-817.
West, R. (2014). HAS THE CONSTITUTION FOSTERED A PATHOLOGICAL RIGHTS CULTURE? THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS: A TALE OF TWO RIGHTS. Boston University Law Review, 94893.
Bahmueller, C. F. (2015). Morality. Salem Press Encyclopedia,
Yeaman, A. J. (2004). Professional Ethics for Technology. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 48(2), 11-15. doi:10.1007/BF02762537