Monday, September 18, 2017
CRJ-322 - CRIMINAL MIND CASE STUDY 1
DEVIANT BEHAVIORS
CASE STUDY ONE
1
Deviant Behaviors
Strayer University
Felicia McCaw
Professor Idonia K. Barrett
CRJ322
Online Summer 2017
July 10, 2017
Deviant Behaviors
2
One of the continuous questions in today’s society and the future is how social norms affect society and the populace. Norms are exogenous variables that portray how and why structuralized societal behavior can be advanced and changed. As with the effect of norms that interchange play between moral, social and legal are blurred and sometimes have no delineation between the three.
In consequence, most norms are perceivably viewed and adhered to as standards of society which are obeyed and viewed as a normalcy in everyday society. Further norms are equated to behavioral acts that fulfill the concepts of socialization, social identity, rational choice, self-fulfilling expectations, evolution and acceptable conduct. Also, norms are systematic to behavior as grammar is to the English language. Conditional behavior is fidelity to conformity, socialization, social identity and rational choice as well as how normative beliefs affect behavior.
Further norms are used as restrictive to control behavior, maintain social order, elicit conformity and reflect a correlation between beliefs and behavior. Socialization as a parallel and complement to norms help facilitate a choice between the variables as referenced correct behavior and behavior that is undesirable. Internalized is the process where a psychological need to conform is a set of shared norm. Therefore, acts of deviancy come as a participator against norms and socialization standards and result in deviant behavior.
Even when the act of deviancy occurs it is still an act against internalized norms and therefore a conflictual state against the prevalent status of what behavior is expected as well as choices to be made. The level of norms has the ability to change as views change, concepts of
Deviant Behaviors
3
what is good and what is bad for the people and country and its portrayal of the true self. Actively, social norms are conditional with compliance as a set expectation but with the possibility of being altered as per se for the good of all. Therefore, once norms or social norms are established adherence is expected and acts as a social control to prevent deviancy or perceived views of deviant behavior. As a fidelity to society social control acts as a structural guideline to assist in the continuance of good for the populace and the acts of good for the populace.
When active acts of deviance occur the eroding of self and structure descend to the levels of primal, feral and terroritorial. Because of this active regard to legal sanctions become increasingly voided with summarily disregard for the equality of one much less the many. When the affective states reveal that criminal is norm then the active social control is naught but theory with defiance towards the true law of land and man and deviance allocated to understanding human behavior.
Consequently, the control theories are eroded and any behavior becomes a blasé normalcy and conformity to norms and value of society a heretic. As the level of values and norms descend to immorality thus the regard of respect veers in another direction and becomes primal and animalistic and precipitates aggression and uncontrolled acts without regard for law, order and possible acts of emulation or respect for the dominant race. Therefore, as acts of disregard are done without contemplation of possible self-harm so does the allowance open the gate for deviancy, violence, murder, and increased criminality.
In regards to socialization and nature and nurturing this becomes a point where a deviation occurs when emulation of the dominant classes reflect deviance of expected conduct
Deviant Behaviors
4
therefore it is followed as true right and expectancy to follow whether by temptation, peers, idols or influenced by other people and factors. As social control is usually viewed in a perspective macro-social view this overall peering is minutely hampered but is enhanced by a micro-social perspective with analysis to determine patterns of irregularity and erosion of informal and formal sanctions.
Further the previously held thought of low self-control as held to be perceived as reserved for those of illiteracy, impoverished, unlearned and untaught is now being geared toward equivancy to those of high self-control which makes a mockery of social bonds, strain theories and the differential association by the nature of the act of deliberate deviancy. As with the act of deliberate deviancy this includes the act of criminal acts, conspiracy and defiance of the legal structure in its entirety and nullified acts of socialization (brainwashing).
Also, at the micro-level then macro-level, informal social control can be used by disapproving communication either by gossip or as a result of recordings which spirals upward and outward to influence condemnation or active conformation to standards supposedly adhered to by all. But what occurs at the base is a precipitator to not uphold either informal or formal sanctions and view gossip as a mechanism of social control whether for the good or bad which in turns places informal constrictions or effective negative social control that can be viewed as unethical behavior or a pro-social preventer.
When behavior is exposed to the media as a trumpeter to underline supposed wrongs it can be viewed as egregious behavior being flashed through the news and media. In its effects gossip causes social adhesion and can cause negative connotations either by establishing newly created norms or erasing and eradicating safe, structuralized norms by diverting to acts of
Deviant Behaviors
5
criminal and deviance. Lastly, gossip is not always perceived as a negative but as a possible manipulation tool or facilitator to correct a social dilemma generated by tension, individualism and norms (For example, change from old ways to new ways.).
In the case of Donald Sterling, American Businessman and attorney who previously owned the Los Angeles Clippers, a professional basketball franchise of National Basketball Association (NBA) from 1981 to 2014. In April of 2014, Mr. Sterling was banned for life from the NBA and fined 2.5 Million by formal sanction after private recordings of him making racist comments were made public.
In regard to Donald Sterling’s loss of ownership of the Los Angeles Clippers the effective use of social control is not a factor in the loss of control. Although the level of punishment and fines are a corrective measure as well as a level of negative reinforcement but the level of social control is not a primary factor but a complementary state to adhere to order and restraint. In a perspective view, the compiled action was to save the team, the efforts that Donald Sterling did to push the team to its level of competiveness and rank in the professional field.
Further due to the possibility of labeling, separation was deemed as an effort to salvage the reputation and not lose the rank established, sponsors or his historical gifts to the team. His “baby” still exists because of his foresight and shrewdness. Next, the conversation that was leaked by TMZ Sports and Deadspin, on differing occasions in 2014, to the media which contained a personal message from Donald Sterling to V. Stiviano, mistress, (given name Maria Vanessa Perez) that referred to Black people (and his wish for her not to broadcast that she was associating with Black people because it bothered him, that she can sleep with {Black people}, she can bring them in, she can do whatever she wants, but he requested her to not bring them to
Deviant Behaviors
6
his games). Per se this conversation is not reduced to the level of degradation or inflammatory slurs or slander, it is a personal conversation that was disclosed illegally (due to the right of both parties of privacy and confidentiality). Although publicized, the active fine and formal sanction can still be questioned and challenged.
Therefore, since formal social control authority lies within legislative forces that establish societal guidelines then the act of law and policies were eroded in this challenge of ownership and is more of a display of manipulation, behavior expectation to activate informal social control (incite gossip, hidden prejudice and hate) and act of power. As far as social norms for men of Sterling’s age the use of derogatory language when discussing a member of another race is not a parallel behaviorism, trait that leads to bigotry or is a factor that supports an alignment of profane or derogatory language aimed at another race.
Social norms are geared mostly toward socialization and conditioning where behavior is taught, repeated and instilled to be embedded and internalized. Living in a society that is based on oppression and suppression of races the social norms does not adequately explain or support a theory that men of Sterling’s age has a propensity to be viewed as a bigot or attacker of other races due to age or can be seen exclusively as deviant behavior in a seemingly “politically correct” society that spirals continuously with attacks on Blacks, Latinos, and other races.
For example, a “politically correct” society would never infringe upon the rights of Black people or the rights to an education, health care of any right that contends as an inhibitor to life and procreation. As with the course of politics is the course of legitimacy and correctness of law and land. Therefore, comes the question of what is a “politically correct” society when all rights are stripped and an informal sanction or warning should have been sufficient but due to exterior
Deviant Behaviors
7
pressure the “politically correct” society became the piranha and allowed ownership to be taken by utilizing a formal sanction. Ironic is the viewpoint that as described marginalizing or insulting of groups of people who are disadvantaged, discriminated against is seen as a depiction by the dominant sex or race and as fidelity by implication the enforcing of these sanctions are excessive and in turn victimization. The true context reveals a disparity in the application and enforcing of political correctness in the non-consistent pattern of hidden prejudice, malice and bigotry whether in the same race or dissimilar race.
Consequently, a “political correct” society would have levied a fine not total exclusion from viewing or not being allowed to retain his designated seat at the Los Angeles Clippers game, or banning from life from the NBA. Informal sanctions pertain to norms, taboos and standards and should be enough to halt certain behavior by threat of fine or certain restrictions that would be levied and made to be accounted.
But in this case a formal sanction was imposed on Donald Sterling for his comments which were gained illegally. The purpose of the fine and ostracism was to separate the team (Los Angeles Clippers) from him and adverse publicity, retain the sponsors, and goodwill of the team and continuance.
References
Bicchieri, C., & Muldoon, R. (2011, March 01). Social Norms. Retrieved July 10, 2017, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-norms/
What is the difference between formal and informal sanctions? (n.d.). Retrieved July 10, 2017, from https://www.reference.com/world-view/difference-between-formal-informal-sanctions-5652fda1dc346757
Political correctness. (2017, July 10). Retrieved July 10, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
Saucier, D. A., Hockett, J. M., & Wallenberg, A. S. (2008). The impact of racial slurs and racism on the perceptions
and punishment of violent crime. Journal Of Interpersonal Violence, 23(5), 685-701.
doi:10.1177/0886260507313774
Vejar, C. (2017). Informal & Formal Social Control, Informal & Formal Social Control – Research Stars Sociology, 1.
Vaidyanathan, B., Khalsa, S., & Ecklund, E. H. (2016). Gossip as Social Control: Informal Sanctions on Ethical Violations in Scientific Workplaces. Social Security Bulletin, 63(4), 554-572. Doi: 10.1093/socpro/spw022
Holland, D. (2017). Control Theory of Deviance. Control Theory Of Deviance – Research Starters Sociology, 1-6.
CRJ-322 CRIMINAL MIND DISCUSSION 10
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
Your power point is powerful and expressive and shows depth, feeling and it is presented to intrigue the interest and concern and make a person continue to explore, read and absorb.
One thing about suicide is that it is final and it is a choice individuals make. It is sad that suicide is considered a solution and has connections to mental disorders and mental illness. One thing I know is that helping self means helping others and this makes all life valuable and precious.
Also, the act of suicide always has elements that have triggered a choice like this.
Thank you.
Felicia
Hello everyone
Here is my power point to contribute my help to all those suffering from Mental Illness and Mental Disorders. I too have seen some pretty rude and mean treatment and victimization of people who are ill and disabled.
Thank you!
Felicia
Attachment: MENTAL DISORDERS..ADAM LANZA.FM.Presentation1.pptx (5.667 MB)
Your power point is powerful and expressive and shows depth, feeling and it is presented to intrigue the interest and concern and make a person continue to explore, read and absorb.
One thing about suicide is that it is final and it is a choice individuals make. It is sad that suicide is considered a solution and has connections to mental disorders and mental illness. One thing I know is that helping self means helping others and this makes all life valuable and precious.
Also, the act of suicide always has elements that have triggered a choice like this.
Thank you.
Felicia
Hello everyone
Here is my power point to contribute my help to all those suffering from Mental Illness and Mental Disorders. I too have seen some pretty rude and mean treatment and victimization of people who are ill and disabled.
Thank you!
Felicia
Attachment: MENTAL DISORDERS..ADAM LANZA.FM.Presentation1.pptx (5.667 MB)
CRJ-322 CRIMINAL MIND DISCUSSION 10
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that privacy is an effective tool to fight infringement and vice versa halt an arrest. Further the unconstitutional law is still evidently controversial because it has conflictions with the new allowance of marriages of gay people who have the same rights as heterosexual couples in privacy and public. The confliction is what is considered obscene versus regular. Consequently, it reveals a condescending treatment because the act of sexual intercourse is inherently private and not an act of display so therefore I agree that suspected peeping may have been done. Lastly, the conflictions that exist will have to be addressed to bring a solution to this interesting query.
I agree that homosexuality and the nuclear family have changed the entire concept with allowance for differing structuralized families. As with all families there are patterns of dysfunctionality interwoven. But overall, the challenge is what defines the right and freedom to be and the truth for the all to be challenged since all family structures act as nature and nurture and consequently an anchor to stay strong and be together and defend against all by being one. Someone has to understand that love versus evil is the protector and strength of any family unit.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the case is interesting because Hardwick was able to use the 9th Amendment to support his right to privacy and that this right had been violated. Therefore, acts of a consenting nature that were done privately in an owned, rented or leased structure are protected. As in all the states when this confrontation occurred any act of sodomy was and is still considered against the law. But if the act is done privately does the act if uncovered be chargeable or be charged as invasion and violation of privacy.
As far as the possibility of homosexuality being an issue raising children the perception is that unusual adjustment would be necessary with possible effects to interactive abilities, psychologically and possible low esteem and self-concept. Also, I agree that the child’s well-being may be effected detrimentally by causing a child to become anxious, withdrawn and subsequently hamper the ability to see who they are and allow a safety net to be used.
Further a child in defense of presumptions may decidedly pick his sexual identity without assistance and take up his or her sexual role. Also, I feel that love is what raises a child not same sex parents or differing sex parents.
Thank you.
Felicia
"A Subculture No More"
Go to the Case Brief Website located at http://www.casebriefs.com or use the Internet to research "Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)." Next, analyze the manner in which the defendant, Michael Hardwick, argued that his right to privacy protected him against the Georgia sodomy law. Next, debate whether or not such a law can remain constitutional when same-sex marriage has been ratified in nearly thirty (30) states. Provide support for your response.
BOWERS V HARDWICK
The manner in which the defendant, Michael Hardwick was enabled to argue his right against the Georgia’s Sodomy law by utilizing the 9th Amendment “right to privacy” which had been violated and was presented as argument by his attorney.
In the effect of whether the law regarding sodomy can remain constitutional when same-sex marriage has been ratified in nearly thirty (30) states will be a measure of decision. Due to the 9th Amendment to the right of privacy this conclusively leads to a decision of moot. Even if the law is looked as unconstitutional the “right to privacy” is always prevalent as defense.
As written by Chief Justice Robert Benham “we cannot think of any activity that reasonable persons would rank as more private and more deserving of protection from governmental interference than consensual, private, adult sexual activity”. Therefore, any acts between consenting adults will be deemed private and is not an act that needs governmental monitoring and further that the law violates the privacy guaranteed by a state constitution and because of this citizens are provided more protection by the state versus the federal constitution.
Based on Chapter 12 from the textbook, homosexuality encompasses both specific kinds of sexual behaviors and a more general sexual orientation. Examine the overall impact that homosexuality has on the United States’ definition of a “nuclear family”. Next, give your opinion as to whether this changing trend is permanent or simply a “phase.” Justify your response.
The overall impact of homosexuality on the “nuclear family” of the United States is questionable. As such the role patterning is what is questioned when sexual roles are viewed as acceptance to fit in societal roles.
In relation to a sociological perspective and development of sexual identities it allows the observing of how and why a choice may be made to accept a homosexual role. Also, in relation is psychological and social psychological influences that help in development of sexual self-concept and identity. Pertaining to the “nuclear family” all interact to either stabilize or unstablize because differing socializations affect a family’s strength or consistency in determining what sexual identity will be accepted as well as any judgmental view that causes internal and external stress in interactions and social adaption based on rewarded behavior.
Although a differently structured family the “nuclear family” is evolved to be inclusive that change and revolutionize the concept of what a “nuclear family” used to be represented as, e.g., male and female parents with children versus male and male parents with children or female and female parents with children. As thus the new concept of acceptability is changing gradually to accommodate the changes and evolving to render assistance that any changes and affective role may bring forth. This changing trend is a permanency and not a phrase because of the increase in marriages and selection of mates and adoption of children.
Thank you.
Felicia
References:
https://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/georgia/ganews21.htm
https://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/georgia.htm
http://statelaws.findlaw.com/georgia-law/georgia-prohibited-consensual-sexual-activity-laws.html
I agree that privacy is an effective tool to fight infringement and vice versa halt an arrest. Further the unconstitutional law is still evidently controversial because it has conflictions with the new allowance of marriages of gay people who have the same rights as heterosexual couples in privacy and public. The confliction is what is considered obscene versus regular. Consequently, it reveals a condescending treatment because the act of sexual intercourse is inherently private and not an act of display so therefore I agree that suspected peeping may have been done. Lastly, the conflictions that exist will have to be addressed to bring a solution to this interesting query.
I agree that homosexuality and the nuclear family have changed the entire concept with allowance for differing structuralized families. As with all families there are patterns of dysfunctionality interwoven. But overall, the challenge is what defines the right and freedom to be and the truth for the all to be challenged since all family structures act as nature and nurture and consequently an anchor to stay strong and be together and defend against all by being one. Someone has to understand that love versus evil is the protector and strength of any family unit.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the case is interesting because Hardwick was able to use the 9th Amendment to support his right to privacy and that this right had been violated. Therefore, acts of a consenting nature that were done privately in an owned, rented or leased structure are protected. As in all the states when this confrontation occurred any act of sodomy was and is still considered against the law. But if the act is done privately does the act if uncovered be chargeable or be charged as invasion and violation of privacy.
As far as the possibility of homosexuality being an issue raising children the perception is that unusual adjustment would be necessary with possible effects to interactive abilities, psychologically and possible low esteem and self-concept. Also, I agree that the child’s well-being may be effected detrimentally by causing a child to become anxious, withdrawn and subsequently hamper the ability to see who they are and allow a safety net to be used.
Further a child in defense of presumptions may decidedly pick his sexual identity without assistance and take up his or her sexual role. Also, I feel that love is what raises a child not same sex parents or differing sex parents.
Thank you.
Felicia
"A Subculture No More"
Go to the Case Brief Website located at http://www.casebriefs.com or use the Internet to research "Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)." Next, analyze the manner in which the defendant, Michael Hardwick, argued that his right to privacy protected him against the Georgia sodomy law. Next, debate whether or not such a law can remain constitutional when same-sex marriage has been ratified in nearly thirty (30) states. Provide support for your response.
BOWERS V HARDWICK
The manner in which the defendant, Michael Hardwick was enabled to argue his right against the Georgia’s Sodomy law by utilizing the 9th Amendment “right to privacy” which had been violated and was presented as argument by his attorney.
In the effect of whether the law regarding sodomy can remain constitutional when same-sex marriage has been ratified in nearly thirty (30) states will be a measure of decision. Due to the 9th Amendment to the right of privacy this conclusively leads to a decision of moot. Even if the law is looked as unconstitutional the “right to privacy” is always prevalent as defense.
As written by Chief Justice Robert Benham “we cannot think of any activity that reasonable persons would rank as more private and more deserving of protection from governmental interference than consensual, private, adult sexual activity”. Therefore, any acts between consenting adults will be deemed private and is not an act that needs governmental monitoring and further that the law violates the privacy guaranteed by a state constitution and because of this citizens are provided more protection by the state versus the federal constitution.
Based on Chapter 12 from the textbook, homosexuality encompasses both specific kinds of sexual behaviors and a more general sexual orientation. Examine the overall impact that homosexuality has on the United States’ definition of a “nuclear family”. Next, give your opinion as to whether this changing trend is permanent or simply a “phase.” Justify your response.
The overall impact of homosexuality on the “nuclear family” of the United States is questionable. As such the role patterning is what is questioned when sexual roles are viewed as acceptance to fit in societal roles.
In relation to a sociological perspective and development of sexual identities it allows the observing of how and why a choice may be made to accept a homosexual role. Also, in relation is psychological and social psychological influences that help in development of sexual self-concept and identity. Pertaining to the “nuclear family” all interact to either stabilize or unstablize because differing socializations affect a family’s strength or consistency in determining what sexual identity will be accepted as well as any judgmental view that causes internal and external stress in interactions and social adaption based on rewarded behavior.
Although a differently structured family the “nuclear family” is evolved to be inclusive that change and revolutionize the concept of what a “nuclear family” used to be represented as, e.g., male and female parents with children versus male and male parents with children or female and female parents with children. As thus the new concept of acceptability is changing gradually to accommodate the changes and evolving to render assistance that any changes and affective role may bring forth. This changing trend is a permanency and not a phrase because of the increase in marriages and selection of mates and adoption of children.
Thank you.
Felicia
References:
https://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/georgia/ganews21.htm
https://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/georgia.htm
http://statelaws.findlaw.com/georgia-law/georgia-prohibited-consensual-sexual-activity-laws.html
CRJ-322 CRIMINAL MIND DISCUSSION 8
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
The fundamental reasons are correct … exposing anyone to a disease or unwanted sex and knowingly does so is a criminal and is a criminal offense and should be charged and locked away. Children’s parents are the ones who should not want a sex offender in the neighborhood but the facts is they are heavily perpetuated in the low social economy areas and there is resistance in getting them removed from those neighborhoods. I also agree once a sex offender or criminally deviant sex offender sees an avenue to attack they will repeat the pattern and behavior.
As with any type of internet abuse is what the government handles and information that destroys a person’s life, with footage etcetera that entices additional victimization whether the behavior is sexual or predatorial in nature.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the laws have some problems overlapping due to territory lines but this can be worked out by extradition with charges filed and pressed in the state the crime occurred. The laws are made to correct and deter deviances and flagrant disobeying of laws to curve sexual deviance in relation to any sexual exploitation.
The laws regarding children, disabled, and elderly, and the female sex who are the most preyed upon are explicit irregardless to family or intrafamily and they abide with strictness on abuse whether sexual or other in regard to all laws to protect them. Local, state and federal are not a dictatorship … all are free to choose a partner and all rights should be protected and as long as the acts do not cause a problem with the law then it is not a legal issue but a moral concern between partners.
Heterosexual deviance is concerned with acts that differentiate from normal sexual activities. Also, it is not the community that deems an act to be judged but the legal sanctions that guard the structural guidelines of society and relays normalcy.
Thank you.
Felicia
"Perceptions of Intimacy"
Go to the Office of Justice Programs Website located at https://ojp.gov/smart/sorna.htm or use the Internet to research "Sex Offenders and Sex Offenses." Next, specify two (2) fundamental advantages and two (2) disadvantages of state or federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance.
Two advantages of state and federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance are that they serve as reinforcement of normative sexual norms and correct behavior to prevent acts outside the sexual norm that are seen as deviant and criminal. Therefore, the law is a complement and protector of the populace whether in or out of prison.
Also, the laws make it possible to cross borders between states and international borders if the culprit is an American citizen or an adoptee of American standing. Another advantage it clearly lists what is applicable and addressable when a manner of kidnapping occurs and the victim’s will is submerged and subjugated to enact an unwanted sexual act or display to render a citizen powerless and victimized. Further, the act of transporting minors whether with permission or not is also considered an act of deviance and a willing perversion of the party that coaches and encourages obvious acts of criminality and lasciviousness.
Two disadvantages of state or federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance are a near endless source of troubled people with sexual deviance associated with emotional and mental problems. Another disadvantage is that sexual deviance is deeply interwoven in organized crime and as such the deterring of sexual deviance is an uphill battle to keep a moralistic value and principle as a standing rod against the crumbling of societal structure and battle against crime and compliance with evil against people.
Next, take a position as to whether the government (local, state, or federal) should govern consenting adults using the Internet to engage in adult activities. Provide a rationale to support your response.
The government whether local, state or federal have the ability to govern what is permissible on the internet but runs the risk of violating the First Amendment. Because the act of sexuality is deemed an act of consent by adults and their rights and ability to view or read literature or expression of photographic images that can be seen as unwritten language and communication. Thereby, it is hard to govern what an adult can view unless the governmental system is totalitarian in nature and has free will to restrict the input and assimilation of what is seen as unseemly or detrimental to a populace. Further if the expression is not of a nature to encourage lasciviousness or has a conflict against the law then the expression is choice due to a democratic society.
Thank you.
Felicia
The fundamental reasons are correct … exposing anyone to a disease or unwanted sex and knowingly does so is a criminal and is a criminal offense and should be charged and locked away. Children’s parents are the ones who should not want a sex offender in the neighborhood but the facts is they are heavily perpetuated in the low social economy areas and there is resistance in getting them removed from those neighborhoods. I also agree once a sex offender or criminally deviant sex offender sees an avenue to attack they will repeat the pattern and behavior.
As with any type of internet abuse is what the government handles and information that destroys a person’s life, with footage etcetera that entices additional victimization whether the behavior is sexual or predatorial in nature.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the laws have some problems overlapping due to territory lines but this can be worked out by extradition with charges filed and pressed in the state the crime occurred. The laws are made to correct and deter deviances and flagrant disobeying of laws to curve sexual deviance in relation to any sexual exploitation.
The laws regarding children, disabled, and elderly, and the female sex who are the most preyed upon are explicit irregardless to family or intrafamily and they abide with strictness on abuse whether sexual or other in regard to all laws to protect them. Local, state and federal are not a dictatorship … all are free to choose a partner and all rights should be protected and as long as the acts do not cause a problem with the law then it is not a legal issue but a moral concern between partners.
Heterosexual deviance is concerned with acts that differentiate from normal sexual activities. Also, it is not the community that deems an act to be judged but the legal sanctions that guard the structural guidelines of society and relays normalcy.
Thank you.
Felicia
"Perceptions of Intimacy"
Go to the Office of Justice Programs Website located at https://ojp.gov/smart/sorna.htm or use the Internet to research "Sex Offenders and Sex Offenses." Next, specify two (2) fundamental advantages and two (2) disadvantages of state or federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance.
Two advantages of state and federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance are that they serve as reinforcement of normative sexual norms and correct behavior to prevent acts outside the sexual norm that are seen as deviant and criminal. Therefore, the law is a complement and protector of the populace whether in or out of prison.
Also, the laws make it possible to cross borders between states and international borders if the culprit is an American citizen or an adoptee of American standing. Another advantage it clearly lists what is applicable and addressable when a manner of kidnapping occurs and the victim’s will is submerged and subjugated to enact an unwanted sexual act or display to render a citizen powerless and victimized. Further, the act of transporting minors whether with permission or not is also considered an act of deviance and a willing perversion of the party that coaches and encourages obvious acts of criminality and lasciviousness.
Two disadvantages of state or federal criminalization in deterring sexual deviance are a near endless source of troubled people with sexual deviance associated with emotional and mental problems. Another disadvantage is that sexual deviance is deeply interwoven in organized crime and as such the deterring of sexual deviance is an uphill battle to keep a moralistic value and principle as a standing rod against the crumbling of societal structure and battle against crime and compliance with evil against people.
Next, take a position as to whether the government (local, state, or federal) should govern consenting adults using the Internet to engage in adult activities. Provide a rationale to support your response.
The government whether local, state or federal have the ability to govern what is permissible on the internet but runs the risk of violating the First Amendment. Because the act of sexuality is deemed an act of consent by adults and their rights and ability to view or read literature or expression of photographic images that can be seen as unwritten language and communication. Thereby, it is hard to govern what an adult can view unless the governmental system is totalitarian in nature and has free will to restrict the input and assimilation of what is seen as unseemly or detrimental to a populace. Further if the expression is not of a nature to encourage lasciviousness or has a conflict against the law then the expression is choice due to a democratic society.
Thank you.
Felicia
CRJ-322 CRIMINAL MIND DISCUSSION 7
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the act of suicide is truly tragic because everyone has something unique that God blessed us with. Sometimes mental illness acts as a spearhead which cannot be controlled but if help is needed then assistance will be given. Learning to reach out is what is needed.
But unfortunately, it does not always happen and help comes too late because of lack of knowledge and not knowing how to read the signs.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I feel and empathize with people in depression or desperate straits but what helps others is to become a champion for those who can’t fight back. Due to the nature of different scenarios the right to life is for all and nothing is so bad one cannot continue on. Suicide is usually a one party call but it can be deliberately channeled by intentional cruelty that contributes to hopelessness and despair because of norms and taboos in society.
Try to always be a champion for someone.
Thank you.
Felicia
THE BRIDGE (2006 CONTROVERSIAL DOCUMENTARY) – SUICIDE
A 2006 controversial documentary centered around suicide and the surviving family being interviewed and witnesses who were there and viewed the act. The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California is seen as the gate to another world or an exit from a life seen as intolerable. With the witnesses and survivors is the ever eternal sadness and question if they could have helped them or if there was a warning sign(s) that should have raised a flag screaming help.
The Bridge appears to be a fixation in people’s mind that this is it. The end is here and it is not hard but a true way to go … but without a thought I cannot stay. Further it is a curiosity and phenomenon for visitors to query and question why. The ability to be empathy is what it has become a symbol to realize how troubled people are … and an exclamation point to state we can help
Thank you.
Felicia
I agree that the act of suicide is truly tragic because everyone has something unique that God blessed us with. Sometimes mental illness acts as a spearhead which cannot be controlled but if help is needed then assistance will be given. Learning to reach out is what is needed.
But unfortunately, it does not always happen and help comes too late because of lack of knowledge and not knowing how to read the signs.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I feel and empathize with people in depression or desperate straits but what helps others is to become a champion for those who can’t fight back. Due to the nature of different scenarios the right to life is for all and nothing is so bad one cannot continue on. Suicide is usually a one party call but it can be deliberately channeled by intentional cruelty that contributes to hopelessness and despair because of norms and taboos in society.
Try to always be a champion for someone.
Thank you.
Felicia
THE BRIDGE (2006 CONTROVERSIAL DOCUMENTARY) – SUICIDE
A 2006 controversial documentary centered around suicide and the surviving family being interviewed and witnesses who were there and viewed the act. The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California is seen as the gate to another world or an exit from a life seen as intolerable. With the witnesses and survivors is the ever eternal sadness and question if they could have helped them or if there was a warning sign(s) that should have raised a flag screaming help.
The Bridge appears to be a fixation in people’s mind that this is it. The end is here and it is not hard but a true way to go … but without a thought I cannot stay. Further it is a curiosity and phenomenon for visitors to query and question why. The ability to be empathy is what it has become a symbol to realize how troubled people are … and an exclamation point to state we can help
Thank you.
Felicia
CRJ-322 CRIMINAL MIND DISCUSSION 6
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
In regard to the tests (chemical or field sobriety), if there is a medical condition that affects the tests then the officer has the other option to use the field sobriety if the possibilities that medications might affect the chemical test. If there is a medical condition that affects the field sobriety test or a segment of it then the chemical test should be done as well.
I agree that alcohol should not be considered a disease because it is a choice and not a liability until it affects cause severe changes to the physicality in a negative way and a danger to the person.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the imposing of either test might be because of erratic driving but the test itself is not constrictive or a punishment but a necessity to verify if alcohol consumption is the reason.
The alcohol content will have decreased by the next day and should render a correct reading if done by a chemical test. Also, I agree that alcohol is not a disease but complemented with a psychological fault it leads to addiction of alcohol and severe dependency that causes physical problems but sometimes a reversible problem.
Thank you.
Felicia
Functional Alcoholism
Read the article titled “DUI Offense Basics”, located at http://dui.findlaw.com/dui-charges/dui-offense-basics.html. Next, give your opinion as to whether the standards for use of the “field sobriety test” versus the “chemical test” are too subjective for a police officer’s use. Next, analyze the manner in which a judge could refute an officer’s choice to use either test or its results during court proceedings. Justify your response.
The standards for use of the “field sobriety test” versus the “chemical test” are not too subjective for a police officer’s use because both are choices that are controlled by the officer and scenario connected with it. In the case of a suspected DUI the choice would probably be based on possible physical effects (behavior) rather on the sense of smell only. Basically the choice is not a preference but an orderly procedure to decide if one test is sufficient or if the circumstances require both tests. But if the choice of either test is capable of being challenged then the judge can refute the choice because it might fall under the poisonous tree doctrine during the court session.
Further based on the state of tests being refuted it would thereby give the suspected DUI an opening to have charges dropped because of the possible inaccuracy of reading or a possible malfunctioning of the equipment. If the act can be challenged and cedes affirmation then it can conclusively be regarded as an act that can be dismissed.
Based on Chapter 9 of the textbook, suggest one (1) reason why alcoholism should or should not be classified as a disease. Provide support for your position.
One reason alcoholism should not be classified or coded as a disease is because it is not a medical condition. Alcoholism does not become a serious concern until it is a situation where the “crave” makes the need to consume alcohol to hide and it is physically disabling. But as with a theory the control to quit is still enabled and possible. Therefore, if the act of consuming alcohol can be discarded then it is not a disease but if there is heavy dependency then it is a disease.
Thank you.
Felicia
Sobriety Tests. (n.d.). Retrieved August 09, 2017, from http://dui.findlaw.com/dui-arrests/sobriety-tests.html
Blood, Breath and Urine DUI Tests. (n.d.). Retrieved August 09, 2017, from http://www.1800duilaws.com/common/chemtest.asp
In regard to the tests (chemical or field sobriety), if there is a medical condition that affects the tests then the officer has the other option to use the field sobriety if the possibilities that medications might affect the chemical test. If there is a medical condition that affects the field sobriety test or a segment of it then the chemical test should be done as well.
I agree that alcohol should not be considered a disease because it is a choice and not a liability until it affects cause severe changes to the physicality in a negative way and a danger to the person.
Thank you.
Felicia
RESPONSE TO CO-STUDENT
I agree that the imposing of either test might be because of erratic driving but the test itself is not constrictive or a punishment but a necessity to verify if alcohol consumption is the reason.
The alcohol content will have decreased by the next day and should render a correct reading if done by a chemical test. Also, I agree that alcohol is not a disease but complemented with a psychological fault it leads to addiction of alcohol and severe dependency that causes physical problems but sometimes a reversible problem.
Thank you.
Felicia
Functional Alcoholism
Read the article titled “DUI Offense Basics”, located at http://dui.findlaw.com/dui-charges/dui-offense-basics.html. Next, give your opinion as to whether the standards for use of the “field sobriety test” versus the “chemical test” are too subjective for a police officer’s use. Next, analyze the manner in which a judge could refute an officer’s choice to use either test or its results during court proceedings. Justify your response.
The standards for use of the “field sobriety test” versus the “chemical test” are not too subjective for a police officer’s use because both are choices that are controlled by the officer and scenario connected with it. In the case of a suspected DUI the choice would probably be based on possible physical effects (behavior) rather on the sense of smell only. Basically the choice is not a preference but an orderly procedure to decide if one test is sufficient or if the circumstances require both tests. But if the choice of either test is capable of being challenged then the judge can refute the choice because it might fall under the poisonous tree doctrine during the court session.
Further based on the state of tests being refuted it would thereby give the suspected DUI an opening to have charges dropped because of the possible inaccuracy of reading or a possible malfunctioning of the equipment. If the act can be challenged and cedes affirmation then it can conclusively be regarded as an act that can be dismissed.
Based on Chapter 9 of the textbook, suggest one (1) reason why alcoholism should or should not be classified as a disease. Provide support for your position.
One reason alcoholism should not be classified or coded as a disease is because it is not a medical condition. Alcoholism does not become a serious concern until it is a situation where the “crave” makes the need to consume alcohol to hide and it is physically disabling. But as with a theory the control to quit is still enabled and possible. Therefore, if the act of consuming alcohol can be discarded then it is not a disease but if there is heavy dependency then it is a disease.
Thank you.
Felicia
Sobriety Tests. (n.d.). Retrieved August 09, 2017, from http://dui.findlaw.com/dui-arrests/sobriety-tests.html
Blood, Breath and Urine DUI Tests. (n.d.). Retrieved August 09, 2017, from http://www.1800duilaws.com/common/chemtest.asp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
